Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise aggregation/grouping - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeevan Chalke
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise aggregation/grouping
Date
Msg-id CAM2+6=UNWGKTgh9aOn4=SQ72HfFzbVFseh9=5N54bD6KB+D9OQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise aggregation/grouping  (Jeevan Chalke <jeevan.chalke@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise aggregation/grouping  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi Robert,

On pgsql-committers Andres reported one concern about test case failure with installcheck with local settings.
(Sorry, I have not subscribed to that mailing list and thus not able to reply there).

Attached patch which fixes that.

However, I am not sure whether it is expected to have stable regression run with installcheck having local settings.
For example, If I have enabale_hashagg = false locally; I will definitely see failures.

ISTM, that I am missing Andres point here.

Thanks

--
Jeevan Chalke
Technical Architect, Product Development
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Phone: +91 20 66449694

Website: www.enterprisedb.com
EnterpriseDB Blog: http://blogs.enterprisedb.com/
Follow us on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/enterprisedb

This e-mail message (and any attachment) is intended for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. This message contains information from EnterpriseDB Corporation that may be privileged, confidential, or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient or authorized to receive this for the intended recipient, any use, dissemination, distribution, retention, archiving, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message.
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Teodor Sigaev
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 6)
Next
From: Etsuro Fujita
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Add support for tuple routing to foreign partitions