Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Stark
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take
Date
Msg-id CAM-w4HOZ5fPS7GoCTTrW42q01+wPrOWFCnr9H0iDyVTZP2H1CA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
Just poking around with partitioning. I notice that "\d parent"
doesn't list all the partitions, suggesting to use \d+ but a plain
"\d" does indeed list the partitions. That seems a bit strange and
also probably impractical if you have hundreds or thousands of
partitions. Has this come up in previous discussions? Unfortunately
it's proving a bit hard to search for "\d" :/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.
Next
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take