Re: New version numbering practices - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Stark
Subject Re: New version numbering practices
Date
Msg-id CAM-w4HO0nW1bsm_cPF3-fAHd5OAw0MEC5pJiXX+Zu8cea7V4-g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New version numbering practices  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: New version numbering practices  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: New version numbering practices  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I thought we'd pretty much done that cleanup during the cvs->git
> conversion?

I guess I'm talking about tags. I'm not clear on the distinction
between tags and branches names in git.

Prior to 8.0.0 we seem to have tagged the first release with a tag
that doesn't include _0 for the minor release and afterwards with one
that does:

REL2_0
REL6_1
REL6_2
REL6_4
REL7_0
REL7_1
REL7_2
REL7_3
REL7_4
REL8_0_0
REL8_1_0
...



-- 
greg



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ashutosh Sharma
Date:
Subject: Re: OldSnapshotTimemapLock information is missing in monitoring.sgml file
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: New version numbering practices