Re: Allow parallel plan for referential integrity checks? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Gregory Stark (as CFM)
Subject Re: Allow parallel plan for referential integrity checks?
Date
Msg-id CAM-w4HNtzde4X+vdbcWkL1B91MefVFSkCKE=vW28strZq+hj5g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Allow parallel plan for referential integrity checks?  (Frédéric Yhuel <frederic.yhuel@dalibo.com>)
Responses Re: Allow parallel plan for referential integrity checks?
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 12 Dec 2022 at 11:37, Frédéric Yhuel <frederic.yhuel@dalibo.com> wrote:
>
> I've planned to work on it full time on week 10 (6-10 March), if you
> agree to bear with me. The idea would be to bootstrap my brain on it,
> and then continue to work on it from time to time.

Any updates on this patch? Should we move it to next release at this
point? Even if you get time to work on it this commitfest do you think
it's likely to be committable in the next few weeks?

--
Gregory Stark
As Commitfest Manager



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Gregory Stark (as CFM)"
Date:
Subject: Re: explain analyze rows=%.0f
Next
From: Schoemans Maxime
Date:
Subject: Re: Implement missing join selectivity estimation for range types