Re: 2022-01 Commitfest - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Stark
Subject Re: 2022-01 Commitfest
Date
Msg-id CAM-w4HMcY7_7ab1QDofSZY0DBGj0SPmZwULkxgjAwqcSXNJObA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 2022-01 Commitfest  (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: 2022-01 Commitfest  (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
I gave two reviews and received one review but the patches have been
"Moved to next CF". Should I update them to "Returned with Feedback"
given they all did get feedback? I was under the impression "Moved to
next CF" was only for patches that didn't get feedback in a CF and
were still waiting for feedback.

On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 at 11:16, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It's now at least Feb. 1st anywhere on earth, so the commit fest is now over.
>
> Since last week 5 entries were committed, 1 withdrawn, 3 returned with
> feedback, 2 already moved to the next commitfest and 1 rejected.
>
> This gives a total of 211 patches still alive, most of them ready for the next
> and final pg15 commitfest.
>
> Status summary:
> - Needs review: 147.
> - Waiting on Author: 38.
> - Ready for Committer: 26.
> - Committed: 59.
> - Moved to next CF: 3.
> - Returned with Feedback: 5.
> - Rejected: 5.
> - Withdrawn: 9.
> - Total: 292.
>
> I will take care of closing the current commit fest and moving the entries to
> the next one shortly.
>
>


-- 
greg



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_walinspect - a new extension to get raw WAL data and WAL stats
Next
From: Christoph Heiss
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add reloption for views to enable RLS