Re: [RFC] overflow checks optimized away - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Stark
Subject Re: [RFC] overflow checks optimized away
Date
Msg-id CAM-w4HM7vQ-LZS8E3HS9+6hLHW_NSapkAfWJZneyCOKThXvEzA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [RFC] overflow checks optimized away  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu> writes:
>> What version of GCC and other compilers did we decide we're targeting now?
>
> I can't see us moving the compiler goalposts one inch for this.

That's not the question I asked :/

-- 
greg



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Catalin Iacob
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal: PL/Pythonu - function ereport
Next
From: Petr Jelinek
Date:
Subject: Re: [DOCS] max_worker_processes on the standby