On Tue, Mar 10, 2026 at 11:09 PM Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote:
> +1 for initializing all padding in WAL records. In fact I thought that
> we already did that. (Except in this case, apparently)
I found 42 exceptions like this. See the attached patch, it
initializes some WAL records and removes the WAL-related Valgrind
suppressions. The regression tests pass under Valgrind with these
changes.
As discussed above, I used memset instead of = { 0 }. I could observe
the latter to not initialize the padding on some configurations.
