Re: Upgrade from Fedora 40 to Fedora 42, or from PostgreSQL 16.3 to PostgreSQL 16.9 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael J. Baars
Subject Re: Upgrade from Fedora 40 to Fedora 42, or from PostgreSQL 16.3 to PostgreSQL 16.9
Date
Msg-id CALudE+4LGtSANZyH0EJ4=Q-Ys2W7ohObkkTQwqe=Dn-9qyYw8A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Upgrade from Fedora 40 to Fedora 42, or from PostgreSQL 16.3 to PostgreSQL 16.9  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Upgrade from Fedora 40 to Fedora 42, or from PostgreSQL 16.3 to PostgreSQL 16.9
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Jul 19, 2025 at 5:36 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> "Michael J. Baars" <mjbaars1977.pgsql@gmail.com> writes:
> > Compiling from source with a default ./configure --prefix=/usr/local
> > solves the problem.
>
> Cool.  I confess I have no idea what the triggering difference
> was, because the extra options you mentioned before don't look
> performance-relevant.  I guess -DOPENSSL_NO_ENGINE could hurt
> SSL encryption speed, but unless your workload involved shoving
> huge amounts of data over an SSL connection, it doesn't seem
> like that would amount to much.  Anyway, probably not worth
> expending additional brain cells on.

The funny thing is, that ssl is unset in the config files and the
default is ssl=off.

>                         regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alexander Lakhin
Date:
Subject: Re: stats.sql might fail due to shared buffers also used by parallel tests
Next
From: Nikhil Kumar Veldanda
Date:
Subject: Re: Support for 8-byte TOAST values (aka the TOAST infinite loop problem)