Re: SQL:2011 PERIODS vs Postgres Ranges? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ibrar Ahmed
Subject Re: SQL:2011 PERIODS vs Postgres Ranges?
Date
Msg-id CALtqXTeJXQCb-ZEKazw8o51OmOujkaOQo6OkNQNOgtc0bzv3kg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SQL:2011 PERIODS vs Postgres Ranges?  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: SQL:2011 PERIODS vs Postgres Ranges?
List pgsql-hackers


On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 12:39 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 04:51:01PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> This patch had no reviews, unfortunately it cannot be applied
> cleanly.  Could you send a rebase please?

This had no replies after two weeks, so I have marked the patch as
RwF.  Please feel free to resubmit if you are planning to work more on
that.
--
Michael
 
I have spent some more time on the patch and did a lot of cleanup along with some fixes, compilation errors, and warnings. There is a need for another round of clean up to make that patch perfect. Currently, it based on master (0525572860335d050a1bea194a5278c8833304d1). Regression is not passing because it is dependent on the range_agg patch. Currently, I am collecting all the TODO's and try to finish all of these. 

The patch requires some reviews, so I am putting that again in the current commitfest.


--
Ibrar Ahmed
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Date:
Subject: Re: Add important info about ANALYZE after create Functional Index
Next
From: Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Date:
Subject: Re: Add important info about ANALYZE after create Functional Index