Re: SQL:2011 PERIODS vs Postgres Ranges? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ibrar Ahmed
Subject Re: SQL:2011 PERIODS vs Postgres Ranges?
Date
Msg-id CALtqXTdJEXE3YR9ATVfR2ajmjyk3TsioA7q7wbYkxdcY6w_aGg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SQL:2011 PERIODS vs Postgres Ranges?  (David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>)
Responses Re: SQL:2011 PERIODS vs Postgres Ranges?  (Paul A Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com>)
List pgsql-hackers


On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 4:54 PM David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> wrote:
On 4/8/21 7:40 PM, Paul A Jungwirth wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 7:22 AM David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> wrote:
>>
>> Paul, you can submit to the next CF when you are ready with a new patch.
>
> Thanks David! I've made a lot of progress but still need to finish
> support for CASCADE on temporal foreign keys. I've been swamped with
> other things, but hopefully I can get something during this current
> CF.

The next CF starts on July 1 so you have some time.

Regards,
--
-David
david@pgmasters.net

Based on last comments of Paul and David S I am changing the status to "Waiting on Author". 


--
Ibrar Ahmed

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ibrar Ahmed
Date:
Subject: Re: Asymmetric partition-wise JOIN
Next
From: James Coleman
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use optimized single-datum tuplesort in ExecSort