Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: introduce dynamic shared memory registry - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bharath Rupireddy
Subject Re: introduce dynamic shared memory registry
Date
Msg-id CALj2ACWuiAm7Rr13PFfaiQfOHUoCbJOJvU72jyLnj4xfoEOAEg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: introduce dynamic shared memory registry  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: introduce dynamic shared memory registry
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 9:37 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The autoprewarm change (0003) does use this variable.  I considered making
> it optional (i.e., you could pass in NULL if you didn't want it), but I
> didn't feel like the extra code in GetNamedDSMSegment() to allow this was
> worth it so that callers could avoid creating a single bool.

I'm okay with it.

The v8 patches look good to me.

--
Bharath Rupireddy
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Maiquel Grassi
Date:
Subject: RE: New Window Function: ROW_NUMBER_DESC() OVER() ?
Next
From: John Naylor
Date:
Subject: Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum