Re: REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) doesn't check the table AM - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bharath Rupireddy
Subject Re: REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) doesn't check the table AM
Date
Msg-id CALj2ACWMYe=-fbKYNbXw0trjqBBUy6tDbdAewtaOVQ--v23+aQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) doesn't check the table AM  (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On Fri, Sep 4, 2026 at 4:13 PM Bharath Rupireddy
<bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I attached the updated patch. Please review it.
>
> The v4 patch looks good to me. pgindent and tests are happy.

Please find the attached v5 patch containing detail instead of hint
and also consistent wording as discussed here:
https://postgr.es/m/CALj2ACXyTPZEcGeKgHQjtSCScOOLpHNhAdH3Cn2T48aXg2LZfA%40mail.gmail.com

--
Bharath Rupireddy
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Geier
Date:
Subject: Re: Add pg_stat_vfdcache view for VFD cache statistics
Next
From: "Greg Burd"
Date:
Subject: ExecForceStoreHeapTuple() loses tts_tid, so ORDER BY-op index scans project an invalid ctid