On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 10:20 AM Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu> wrote:
>
> This doesn't seem to be getting any further attention. It sounds like
> Julien didn't agree with the scope of the text. Bharath do you think
> Julien's comments make sense? Will you have a chance to look at this?
Thanks Greg. I was busy with other features.
Thanks Julien for the off-list discussion. I tried to address review
comments in the v3 patch attached. Now, I've added the notes in
high-availability.sgml which sort of suits more and closer to physical
replicatioin than contrib.sgml or extend.sgml.
Thoughts?
Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.