Re: enhance wraparound warnings - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bharath Rupireddy
Subject Re: enhance wraparound warnings
Date
Msg-id CALj2ACW6m2r40TW1sAZjVDP40NKbESLyUP6jRvMNGLAJtgpq9A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: enhance wraparound warnings  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On Tue, Aug 4, 2026 at 1:41 AM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Just a quick question: is the documentation change considered
> > backpatchable when the source commit exists in older versions? I mean,
> > does it fall into the bug or inconsistency category that qualifies for
> > backpatching?
>
> Yes, I think 0002 is backpatchable.  The issue is minor, but the documentation
> example is clearly inconsistent with the actual runtime message in branches
> where the source commit was backpatched.  So I see this as a documentation
> bug fix rather than a cosmetic wording change.

Sounds good to me. Thanks for clarifying.

--
Bharath Rupireddy
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kirk Roybal
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add PROMPT_COMMAND and dynamic prompt support to psql
Next
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: doc: clarify wal_sender_shutdown_timeout behavior for small values