Re: Refactor "mutually exclusive options" error reporting code in parse_subscription_options - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bharath Rupireddy
Subject Re: Refactor "mutually exclusive options" error reporting code in parse_subscription_options
Date
Msg-id CALj2ACV_mFYtgPxbTZ68b5+4MtUn3Ra48ETkq94pLEyAwhHT+A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Refactor "mutually exclusive options" error reporting code in parse_subscription_options  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 11:04 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 10:59:37AM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> > I'm not able to grasp what are the incompatibilities we can have if
> > the enums are used as bit masks. It will be great if anyone throws
> > some light on this?
>
> 0176753 is one example.

Hm. I get it, it is the coding style incompatibilities. Thanks.

With Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bharath Rupireddy
Date:
Subject: Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side
Next
From: Neil Chen
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] In psql \?, add [+] annotation where appropriate