Re: Support worker_spi to execute the function dynamically. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bharath Rupireddy
Subject Re: Support worker_spi to execute the function dynamically.
Date
Msg-id CALj2ACUuceutw_U-DC4zTikrhKDbLr8P=gwTYHDnGKO8BaQbOw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Support worker_spi to execute the function dynamically.  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 2:59 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 05:54:55PM +0900, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
> > Yes, you're right. When I tried using worker_spi to test wait event,
> > I found the behavior. And thanks a lot for your patch. I wasn't aware
> > of the way.  I'll merge your patch to the tests for wait events.
>
> Be careful when using that.  I have not spent more than a few minutes
> to show my point, but what I sent lacks a shmem_request_hook in
> _PG_init(), for example, to request an amount of shared memory equal
> to the size of the state structure.

I think the preferred way to grab a chunk of shared memory for an
external module is by using shmem_request_hook and shmem_startup_hook.
Wait events shared memory too can use them.

--
Bharath Rupireddy
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Support worker_spi to execute the function dynamically.
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Extracting cross-version-upgrade knowledge from buildfarm client