Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bharath Rupireddy
Subject Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby
Date
Msg-id CALj2ACUV6QzAvzjDDbu2oyhrVgAP98ypobY25b-dQGFom7Gjtw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby  (shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 5:05 PM shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 3:26 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 7:37 PM Drouvot, Bertrand
> > <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
>
> > 3. As mentioned in the initial email, I think it would be better to
> > replace LIST_SLOTS command with a SELECT query.
> >
>
> I had a look at this thread. I am interested to work on this and can
> spend some time addressing the comments given here.

Thanks for your interest. Coincidentally, I started to split the patch
into 2 recently - 0001 making the specified logical wal senders wait
for specified standbys to ack, 0002 synchronize logical slots. I think
I'll have these patches ready by early next week. For 0002, I'll
consider your latest changes having LIST_SLOTS removed.

--
Bharath Rupireddy
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL Insertion Lock Improvements
Next
From: Junwang Zhao
Date:
Subject: table_open/table_close with different lock mode