On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 4:54 PM japin <japinli@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jan 2021 at 18:57, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 4:03 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> That sounds like a better way to fix and in fact, I was about to
> >> suggest the same after reading your previous email. I'll think more on
> >> this but in the meantime, can you add the test case in the patch as
> >> requested earlier as well.
> >
> > @Li Japin Please let me know if you have already started to work on
> > the test case, otherwise I can make a 0002 patch for the test case and
> > post.
> >
>
> Yeah, I'm working on the test case. Since I'm not familair with the logical
> replication test, it may take some times.
Thanks a lot. I quickly added the initial use case where we saw the
bug, attached is 0002 patch. Please have a look and add further use
cases if necessary. If okay, it's better to make a cf entry.
I have one comment in v3-0001 patch,
+ * There might some relations dropped from the publication, we do
I think we should change it to - "There might be some relations".
With Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
