Re: Removing a few more lseek() calls - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ashwin Agrawal
Subject Re: Removing a few more lseek() calls
Date
Msg-id CALfoeitasTM935rd4Jy0HhFJXW3eLM7YYKjr8WkpH5A-JGwh+w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Removing a few more lseek() calls  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 2:14 AM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,

Patch 0001 gets rid of the unconditional lseek() calls for SLRU I/O,
as a small follow-up to commit c24dcd0c.  Patch 0002 gets rid of a few
places that usually do a good job of avoiding lseek() calls while
reading and writing WAL, but it seems better to have no code at all.

I reviewed the changes and they look good to me. Code looks much cleaner after 2nd patch.
After these changes, only one usage of SLRU_SEEK_FAILED remains in SimpleLruDoesPhysicalPageExist().

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: UCT (Re: pgsql: Update time zone data files to tzdata release 2019a.)
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: UCT (Re: pgsql: Update time zone data files to tzdata release2019a.)