Re: Known Bugs on Postgres 9.5 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Vick Khera
Subject Re: Known Bugs on Postgres 9.5
Date
Msg-id CALd+dcexJPARvW+OKNbdBD4cfaRwRNujh5NvxRuvO3riNMfwnQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Known Bugs on Postgres 9.5  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Sat, May 5, 2018 at 7:49 PM, David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
If you want an opinion, opting for more than one release behind current on fear grounds is an ultra-conservative position - you might as well minimize the pain and go recent and keep it longer.  At this point I'd be asking myself whether 9.6 or 10 is the better choice.  Though with a third-party application that runs on top of it I'd probably limit myself to the highest release they purport to support.


Precisely why I suggest 9.6 

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Laurenz Albe
Date:
Subject: Re: what's the error meaning? on mast/slavery replication .
Next
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: User defined functions in Postgresql, troubles with the c code