Re: Vacuum as "easily obtained" locks - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Sergey Konoplev
Subject Re: Vacuum as "easily obtained" locks
Date
Msg-id CAL_0b1vF7PbgS+pUcE6-uZswbGJN83s890iPpYztbdkr-Qs4MQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Vacuum as "easily obtained" locks  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
On 3 August 2011 18:17, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Would my applications
>> constant polling of the queue mean that the lock could not be easily
>> obtained?
>
> Very possible, depending on what duty cycle is involved there.

Is there any ways of guaranteed concurrent obtaining it?

>
>                        regards, tom lane
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>



--
Sergey Konoplev

Blog: http://gray-hemp.blogspot.com /
Linkedin: http://ru.linkedin.com/in/grayhemp /
JID/GTalk: gray.ru@gmail.com / Skype: gray-hemp

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Vacuum as "easily obtained" locks
Next
From: Michael Graham
Date:
Subject: Re: Vacuum as "easily obtained" locks