Re: Custom tuplesorts for extensions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Borisov
Subject Re: Custom tuplesorts for extensions
Date
Msg-id CALT9ZEHxJbjWN-Ap+i+9K7S3HKgiVjyiNDSPUubF5v4gOVEXBg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Custom tuplesorts for extensions  (Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Custom tuplesorts for extensions
List pgsql-hackers
Thank you for caching this.  Fixed in the revision attached.

Testing subsets of patchsets in cfbot looks like a good idea to me.
However, I'm not sure if we always require subsets to be consistent.
 
Hi, hackers!

I've looked through a new v6 of a patchset and find it ok. When applied 0001+0002 only I don't see warnings anymore. Build and tests are successful and Cfbot also looks good. I've marked the patch as RfC.

--
Best regards,
Pavel Borisov

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Japin Li
Date:
Subject: Re: Typo in misc_sanity.sql?
Next
From: Bharath Rupireddy
Date:
Subject: Re: add log messages when replication slots become active and inactive (was Re: Is it worth adding ReplicationSlot active_pid to ReplicationSlotPersistentData?)