Re: XLog size reductions: Reduced XLog record header size for PG17 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Borisov
Subject Re: XLog size reductions: Reduced XLog record header size for PG17
Date
Msg-id CALT9ZEFx4jJ47t-Vmz-jAVRrG+9TSP9uThDssbDHmWdsSjz5Fw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: XLog size reductions: Reduced XLog record header size for PG17  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: XLog size reductions: Reduced XLog record header size for PG17
List pgsql-hackers
Hi and Happy New Year!

I've looked through the patches and the change seems quite small and justified. But at the second round, some doubt arises on whether this long patchset indeed introduces enough performance gain? I may be wrong, but it saves only several bytes and the performance gain would be only in some specific artificial workload.  Did you do some measurements? Do we have several percent performance-wise?

Kind regards,
Pavel Borisov

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication
Next
From: Dean Rasheed
Date:
Subject: Re: Adding OLD/NEW support to RETURNING