Re: Defer selection of asynchronous subplans until the executor initialization stage - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Zhihong Yu
Subject Re: Defer selection of asynchronous subplans until the executor initialization stage
Date
Msg-id CALNJ-vTyXON6XjumbFPMw6RFRwXFsnATnzUpAvtafFRKzC=AQA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Defer selection of asynchronous subplans until the executor initialization stage  (Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Defer selection of asynchronous subplans until the executor initialization stage
List pgsql-hackers


On Sun, Apr 3, 2022 at 3:28 AM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Mar 13, 2022 at 6:39 PM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 3:40 PM Alexander Pyhalov
> <a.pyhalov@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> > The patch looks good to me and seems to work as expected.
>
> I’m planning to commit the patch.

I polished the patch a bit:

* Reordered a bit of code in create_append_plan() in logical order (no
functional changes).
* Added more comments.
* Added/Tweaked regression test cases.

Also, I added the commit message.  Attached is a new version of the
patch.  Barring objections, I’ll commit this.

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
Hi,

+   WRITE_ENUM_FIELD(status, SubqueryScanStatus);

Looks like the new field can be named subquerystatus - this way its purpose is clearer.

+ * mark_async_capable_plan
+ *     Check whether a given Path node is async-capable, and if so, mark the
+ *     Plan node created from it as such.

Please add comment explaining what the return value means.

+           if (!IsA(plan, Result) &&
+               mark_async_capable_plan(plan,
+                                       ((ProjectionPath *) path)->subpath))
+               return true;

by returning true, `plan->async_capable = true;` is skipped.
Is that intentional ?

Cheers 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_ls_tmpdir to show directories and shared filesets (and pg_ls_*)
Next
From: Joseph Koshakow
Date:
Subject: Re: Fix overflow in DecodeInterval