Re: pg_ctl idempotent option - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Vik Reykja
Subject Re: pg_ctl idempotent option
Date
Msg-id CALDgxVtZCpo5-4ey5oNH_WXLHhMJ9TF7vx5o+0ZNSus31QXwoA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_ctl idempotent option  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pg_ctl idempotent option
List pgsql-hackers
<div dir="ltr">On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Tom Lane <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us"
target="_blank">tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us</a>></span>wrote:<br /><div class="gmail_extra"><div
class="gmail_quote"><blockquoteclass="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc
solid;padding-left:1ex">Peter Eisentraut <<a href="mailto:peter_e@gmx.net">peter_e@gmx.net</a>> writes:<br />
>Here is a patch to add an option -I/--idempotent to pg_ctl, the result<br /> > of which is that pg_ctl doesn't
erroron start or stop if the server is<br /> > already running or already stopped.<br /><br /> Idempotent is a
ten-dollarword.  Can we find something that average<br /> people wouldn't need to consult a dictionary to
understand?<br/></blockquote></div><br /></div><div class="gmail_extra">I disagree that we should dumb things down when
theword means exactly what we want and based on the rest of this thread is the only word or word cluster that carries
thedesired meaning.<br /><br /></div>I vote to keep --idempotent.<br /><div class="gmail_extra"><br /></div><div
class="gmail_extra">Vik<br/></div></div> 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Dickson S. Guedes"
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_ctl idempotent option
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: logical changeset generation v4