Re: pg_ctl idempotent option - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Vik Reykja
Subject Re: pg_ctl idempotent option
Date
Msg-id CALDgxVtZCpo5-4ey5oNH_WXLHhMJ9TF7vx5o+0ZNSus31QXwoA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: pg_ctl idempotent option  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pg_ctl idempotent option
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Here is a patch to add an option -I/--idempotent to pg_ctl, the result
> of which is that pg_ctl doesn't error on start or stop if the server is
> already running or already stopped.

Idempotent is a ten-dollar word.  Can we find something that average
people wouldn't need to consult a dictionary to understand?

I disagree that we should dumb things down when the word means exactly what we want and based on the rest of this thread is the only word or word cluster that carries the desired meaning.

I vote to keep --idempotent.

Vik

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Dickson S. Guedes"
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_ctl idempotent option
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: logical changeset generation v4