Re: ResourceOwner refactoring - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From vignesh C
Subject Re: ResourceOwner refactoring
Date
Msg-id CALDaNm3xAcy+cPi7pdM91mtzfJZPu3etU8Tm9bVEcJ7vWWSXyA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ResourceOwner refactoring  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Responses Re: ResourceOwner refactoring  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 6:10 PM Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote:
>
> On 08/03/2021 18:47, Ibrar Ahmed wrote:
> > The patchset does not apply successfully, there are some hunk failures.
> >
> > http://cfbot.cputube.org/patch_32_2834.log
> > <http://cfbot.cputube.org/patch_32_2834.log>
> >
> > v6-0002-Make-resowners-more-easily-extensible.patch
> >
> > 1 out of 6 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
> > src/backend/utils/cache/plancache.c.rej
> > 2 out of 15 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
> > src/backend/utils/resowner/resowner.c.rej
> >
> >
> > Can we get a rebase?
>
> Here you go.

The patch does not apply on Head anymore, could you rebase and post a
patch. I'm changing the status to "Waiting for Author".

Regards,
Vignesh



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: vignesh C
Date:
Subject: Re: Polyphase merge is obsolete
Next
From: Ajin Cherian
Date:
Subject: Re: logical replication empty transactions