Re: Update Unicode data to Unicode 16.0.0 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From vignesh C
Subject Re: Update Unicode data to Unicode 16.0.0
Date
Msg-id CALDaNm3hAvDNJ7tr2b-vjR_sVyVvMhHgz_uTNsEBpG3NQHQ=jA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Update Unicode data to Unicode 16.0.0  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 at 23:03, Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2025-03-16 at 19:10 +0530, vignesh C wrote:
> > We currently have two Commitfest entries for the same thread at [1]
> > and [2]. Are both still necessary, or can we consolidate tracking
> > into
> > a single entry?
>
> I'm fine removing my CF entry, but unfortunately there's no "withdrawn
> -- duplicate", so it might send the wrong message.

Yes, we don't have "withdrawn duplicate", I have closed it as
withdrawn, anyway we can get it reviewed and committed using the other
entry.

Regards,
Vignesh



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: support fix query_id for temp table
Next
From: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)"
Date:
Subject: RE: long-standing data loss bug in initial sync of logical replication