Re: sequencesync worker race with REFRESH SEQUENCES - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From vignesh C
Subject Re: sequencesync worker race with REFRESH SEQUENCES
Date
Msg-id CALDaNm3MHsVJiW1mfzAX_n7bQvrvpR_D+xKNRCGOuToDoXhE2A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
Responses Re: sequencesync worker race with REFRESH SEQUENCES
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 21 Jul 2026 at 10:48, Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
<kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> My assumption was that the connection was not so heavy operation.
> If it's not correct, yes the connection should be established later.

FYI, the v3-0002 patch from [1], which fixes this issue, applies
cleanly to both the master and PG19 branches. I'm re-attaching the
same patch here to make it easier for reviewers to access and review
it.

[1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALDaNm0wi5XxbHsmKT%2BphLHwV%3DNtUeFeCpiKkjx29RanJjJ7UQ%40mail.gmail.com

Regards,
Vignesh

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ian Lawrence Barwick
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add pg_get_event_trigger_ddl() function
Next
From: shveta malik
Date:
Subject: Re: Support EXCEPT for TABLES IN SCHEMA publications