Re: Printing backtrace of postgres processes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From vignesh C
Subject Re: Printing backtrace of postgres processes
Date
Msg-id CALDaNm3MGVP_WK1Uuf=BiAJ9PeVOfciwLy0mrFA1JNbRp99VOQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Printing backtrace of postgres processes  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
Responses Re: Printing backtrace of postgres processes
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 4:06 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
>
> > On 26 Aug 2021, at 16:56, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > The previous patch was failing because of the recent test changes made
> > by commit 201a76183e2 which unified new and get_new_node, attached
> > patch has the changes to handle the changes accordingly.
>
> This patch now fails because of the test changes made by commit b3b4d8e68a,
> please submit a rebase.

Thanks for reporting this, the attached v9 patch has the changes for the same.

Regards,
Vignesh

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Antonin Houska
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Full support for index LP_DEAD hint bits on standby
Next
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_rewind race condition just after promotion