Re: Implementing Incremental View Maintenance - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From vignesh C
Subject Re: Implementing Incremental View Maintenance
Date
Msg-id CALDaNm2UoQ64B-GW0q4U_5RURddKSmsJMjDv2f-uM6c4+QakSw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Implementing Incremental View Maintenance  (Yugo NAGATA <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>)
Responses Re: Implementing Incremental View Maintenance  (Yugo NAGATA <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 10:08 AM Yugo NAGATA <nagata@sraoss.co.jp> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 7 May 2021 14:14:16 +0900
> Yugo NAGATA <nagata@sraoss.co.jp> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 16:03:48 +0900
> > Yugo NAGATA <nagata@sraoss.co.jp> wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 15:46:21 +0900
> > > Yugo NAGATA <nagata@sraoss.co.jp> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 09:51:34 +0900
> > > > Yugo NAGATA <nagata@sraoss.co.jp> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Mon, 19 Apr 2021 17:40:31 -0400
> > > > > Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> > > > > > > This patch (v22c) just crashed for me with an assertion failure on
> > > > > > > Fedora 31. Here's the stack trace:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > #2  0x000000000094a54a in ExceptionalCondition
> > > > > > > (conditionName=conditionName@entry=0xa91dae "queryDesc->sourceText !=
> > > > > > > NULL", errorType=errorType@entry=0x99b468 "FailedAssertion",
> > > > > > > fileName=fileName@entry=0xa91468
> > > > > > > "/home/andrew/pgl/pg_head/src/backend/executor/execMain.c",
> > > > > > > lineNumber=lineNumber@entry=199) at
> > > > > > > /home/andrew/pgl/pg_head/src/backend/utils/error/assert.c:69
> > > > > >
> > > > > > That assert just got added a few days ago, so that's why the patch
> > > > > > seemed OK before.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you for letting me know. I'll fix it.
> > > >
> > > > Attached is the fixed patch.
> > > >
> > > > queryDesc->sourceText cannot be NULL after commit 1111b2668d8,
> > > > so now we pass an empty string "" for refresh_matview_datafill() instead NULL
> > > > when maintaining views incrementally.
> > >
> > > I am sorry, I forgot to include a fix for 8aba9322511.
> > > Attached is the fixed version.
> >
> > Attached is the rebased patch (for 6b8d29419d).
>
> I attached a rebased patch.

The patch does not apply on Head anymore, could you rebase and post a
patch. I'm changing the status to "Waiting for Author".

Regards,
Vignesh



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: vignesh C
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays
Next
From: vignesh C
Date:
Subject: Re: Make Append Cost aware of some run time partition prune case