Re: Test to dump and restore objects left behind by regression - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From vignesh C
Subject Re: Test to dump and restore objects left behind by regression
Date
Msg-id CALDaNm2R5x2C6ObvksZP_yZ+nJ=2PBPj0SWvmo0n2Lub3VDXAA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Test to dump and restore objects left behind by regression  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 20 Mar 2025 at 22:09, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
>
> On 2025-Mar-20, vignesh C wrote:
>
> > Will it help the execution time if we use --jobs in case of pg_dump
> > and pg_restore wherever supported:
>
> As I said in another thread, I think we should enable this test to run
> without requiring any PG_TEST_EXTRA, because otherwise the only way to
> know about problems is to commit a patch and wait for buildfarm to run
> it.  Furthermore, I think running all 4 dump format modes is a waste of
> time; there isn't any extra coverage by running this test in additional
> formats.

+1 for running it in only one of the formats.

Regards,
Vignesh



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: Test to dump and restore objects left behind by regression
Next
From: Sami Imseih
Date:
Subject: Re: making EXPLAIN extensible