Re: Skipping schema changes in publication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From vignesh C
Subject Re: Skipping schema changes in publication
Date
Msg-id CALDaNm2OgXwcd+BBYKSdqudw8Nn3catvvezuDEba4tbJZs0xZg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Skipping schema changes in publication  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 11 Feb 2026 at 11:32, David G. Johnston
<david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, February 10, 2026, shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > The attached v42 version patch has the changes for the same.
>> >
>>
>> Thanks, will review.
>
>
> Publication names are unique within the database.  In check_publications_except_list, the use of “select distinct”
whenpulling from pg_publication by name is unnecessary.  Furthermore, if we only have a single publication name it is
unnecessaryto perform the check and thus no need to even run the query. 

Thanks, we will handle this in the next version.

Regards,
Vignesh



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: Skipping schema changes in publication
Next
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: Do we still need MULE_INTERNAL?