Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Should smgrdounlink() be removed? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From vignesh C
Subject Re: Should smgrdounlink() be removed?
Date
Msg-id CALDaNm2J72Eq4xroxx4kA2jXkvgvVcG4-mXtiANe4jb9KfcdxA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Should smgrdounlink() be removed?  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Responses Re: Should smgrdounlink() be removed?  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 8:33 AM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
>
> I see that commit 33a94bae605edf3ceda6751916f0b1af3e88630a removed
> smgrdounlinkfork() because it was dead code. Should we also remove
> smgrdounlink() now? It also appears to be dead code.
>

I could not find any code reference to smgrdounlink, I feel it can be removed.

Regards,
Vignesh
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: +(pg_lsn, int8) and -(pg_lsn, int8) operators
Next
From: davinder singh
Date:
Subject: Re: PG compilation error with Visual Studio 2015/2017/2019