Re: pg_stat_statements and "IN" conditions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From vignesh C
Subject Re: pg_stat_statements and "IN" conditions
Date
Msg-id CALDaNm25O9jhNt015q3MtsLQ_0qZLXZB1mXKeqg4ZUQSsqZXJQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_stat_statements and "IN" conditions  (Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 at 13:42, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 12:07:44PM GMT, vignesh C wrote:
> >
> > I noticed that the feedback from Sami at [1] has not yet been
> > addressed, I have changed the status to Waiting on Author, kindly
> > address them and update the status to Needs review.
> > [1] -
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA5RZ0vt29Om%2BtKFOcUNhXV%2BkKpNnj0yj6OFho3-wngcMHWnAQ%40mail.gmail.com
>
> I'm afraid there is a disagreement about this part of the feedback. I'm
> not yet convinced about the idea suggested over there (treating mutable
> functions in the same way as constants) and not planning to change
> anything, at least not in the current version of the patch.

@Sami Imseih Do you have any other suggestions to solve this?
Others: Any thoughts on which way is better in this case?

Regards,
Vignesh



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Álvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Fwd: lwlocknames.h beautification attempt
Next
From: Daniil Davydov
Date:
Subject: Re: Forbid to DROP temp tables of other sessions