Re: Skipping schema changes in publication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From vignesh C
Subject Re: Skipping schema changes in publication
Date
Msg-id CALDaNm1CiBYcteE_jjPA4BPHfX30dg9eTTTkJgkjY5tgE7t=bQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: Skipping schema changes in publication  (Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Skipping schema changes in publication
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 31 Mar 2026 at 06:00, Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Vignesh.
>
> Some review comments for patch v4-0001.
>
> ======
> doc/src/sgml/ref/alter_publication.sgml
>
> 1.
> -    [ ONLY ] <replaceable class="parameter">table_name</replaceable> [ * ]
> +    TABLE <replaceable class="parameter">table_object</replaceable> [, ... ]
> +
> +<phrase>and <replaceable class="parameter">table_object</replaceable>
> is:</phrase>
> +
> +   [ ONLY ] <replaceable class="parameter">table_name</replaceable> [ * ]
>
> With the introduction of 'table_object' I expected that
> 'table_and_columns' and 'publication_drop_object' would also make use
> of it. Why not?
>
> ======
> doc/src/sgml/ref/create_publication.sgml
>
> 2.
> -    [ ONLY ] <replaceable class="parameter">table_name</replaceable> [ * ]
> +    TABLE <replaceable class="parameter">table_object</replaceable> [, ... ]
> +
> +<phrase>and <replaceable class="parameter">table_object</replaceable>
> is:</phrase>
> +
> +   [ ONLY ] <replaceable class="parameter">table_name</replaceable> [ * ]
>
> With the introduction of 'table_object' I expected that
> 'table_and_columns' would also make use of it. Why not?
>

Thanks for the comments. This is addressed in the 002 patch attached.
The 001 patch has the rebased version of the patch at [1] to fix
Peter's earlier comments at [2].

[1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALDaNm0mYT55pjdyN-yY%3D5dSOfMVx307CtP3xYqzWVa0MPRtLQ%40mail.gmail.com
[2] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAHut%2BPvw-XNBnW-ymGdWpLxaEime7_EdOihcUheGyZvw73kcgg%40mail.gmail.com

Regards,
Vignesh-

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jim Jones
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP - xmlvalidate implementation from TODO list
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Initial COPY of Logical Replication is too slow