Re: [PATCH] Add <> support to sepgsql_restorecon - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From vignesh C
Subject Re: [PATCH] Add <> support to sepgsql_restorecon
Date
Msg-id CALDaNm0ti481FyQS1Z8nO11mV1dLyOJWOHZ_XDEciGq=hWvfXg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Add <> support to sepgsql_restorecon  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 at 23:57, Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> wrote:
>
> The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
> make installcheck-world:  not tested
> Implements feature:       not tested
> Spec compliant:           not tested
> Documentation:            not tested
>
> This needs regression test support for the feature and some minimal documentation that shows how to make use of it.
>
> The new status of this patch is: Waiting on Author

By mistake instead of setting the patch to "Moved to Next CF", I had
selected "Returned with Feedback". Sorry about that.
I have recreated the entry for this patch in the 03/23 commitfest:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/42/4158/

Regards,
Vignesh



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Clarify deleting comments and security labels in synopsis
Next
From: vignesh C
Date:
Subject: Re: Report checkpoint progress with pg_stat_progress_checkpoint (was: Report checkpoint progress in server logs)