Re: [HACKERS] Support to COMMENT ON DATABASE CURRENT_DATABASE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Surafel Temesgen
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Support to COMMENT ON DATABASE CURRENT_DATABASE
Date
Msg-id CALAY4q-WzJ9JZpXWryGH+iYnxVSJdxVVz3Xpzg=fm1K1YkFfMw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Support to COMMENT ON DATABASE CURRENT_DATABASE  (Jing Wang <jingwangian@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

i can't apply your patch cleanly i think it needs rebase

Regards

Surafel


On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 1:38 PM, Jing Wang <jingwangian@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi All,

Enclosed please find the patch only for the pg_dump using the 'comment on current_database' statement.

This patch should be working with the previous patch which is comment_on_current_database_no_pgdump_v3.patch

Regards,
Jing Wang
Fujitsu Australia

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Etsuro Fujita
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6
Next
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively)partitioned tables