Re: [HACKERS] INSERT .. ON CONFLICT DO SELECT [FOR ..] - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marko Tiikkaja
Subject Re: [HACKERS] INSERT .. ON CONFLICT DO SELECT [FOR ..]
Date
Msg-id CAL9smLD1c6uXPNiMeOCoicqiLMzw3aufubMPD+WnCrm6VcdaSA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] INSERT .. ON CONFLICT DO SELECT [FOR ..]  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] INSERT .. ON CONFLICT DO SELECT [FOR ..]  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 6:39 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 8:34 PM, Michael Paquier > wrote: > > The patch does not currently apply. I am noticing as well that Peter > > Geoghegan has registered himself as a reviewer a couple of hours back, > > so moved to next CF with waiting on author as status. > > Marko unregistered me, so I promptly reregistered. You'll have to ask him > why. Oops. I didn't mean to do what I did, and I apologize. I had my months mixed up and I thought this commit fest had ended without you having looked at the patch, so I assumed you would register in the next CF if you were still interested, or someone else could pick it up. In any case, *I* don't have any interest in pursuing this patch at this point. I think this is a really good feature, and as far as I know the patch is technically solid, or at least was when it still applied. Can someone else take it from here? .m

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table
Next
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Removing LEFT JOINs in more cases