Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] Small improvement to compactify_tuples - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Юрий Соколов
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Small improvement to compactify_tuples
Date
Msg-id CAL-rCA0f7e96XKwHHa6TCNBdPBDC5XpeZ2BHV6pyp8-a2rTA=Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Small improvement to compactify_tuples  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Small improvement to compactify_tuples  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view


2017-11-08 1:11 GMT+03:00 Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>:
>
> The same is true of unique indexes vs. non-unique.

offtopic: recently I'd a look at setting LP_DEAD in indexes.
I didn't found huge difference between unique and non-unique indices.
There is codepath that works only for unique, but it is called less
frequently than common codepath that also sets LP_DEAD.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Small improvement to compactify_tuples
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Assert that the correct locks are held whencalling PageGetLSN()