On 24/03/2026 19:32, Carlos Alves wrote: > Just one point I'd like to address is the documentation. Following the > idea of the other "includings" options wouldn't it be interesting to > present a more concise text? As a suggestion, it could be something like: > > "Comments on columns, not null and check constraints, indexes, extended > statistics and the table itself from a source table will be copied. If > the command references multiple source tables with including clauses, > any existing table-level comments will be merged into a single entry, > separated by newlines in the order they were specified."
In the second paragraph of the INCLUDING COMMENTS docs I wrote:
<para> If multiple <literal>LIKE</literal> clauses specify <literal>INCLUDING COMMENTS</literal> and the source tables have table-level comments, these comments will be concatenated in the new table, separated by newlines, in the order that the <literal>LIKE</literal> clauses appear. </para>
Which pretty much states the same? Please let me know if I am missing your point here.
> I've attached some preliminary tests I performed.
Thanks for the thorough tests. Much appreciated!
Best, Jim
Hi Jim!
I saw the second paragraph that you wrote and the explanations are perfect!
My suggestion was instead of describing it in two paragraphs, try describing the parameter in just one (and the text I sent was just a suggestion).
But your document is perfect for me! It was just to simplify, as in the description of the other parameters.
