Re: Should pgAdmin 3 be saved? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Gabriel Martin
Subject Re: Should pgAdmin 3 be saved?
Date
Msg-id CAKzNfLQcDigY-cHcA-Cf+z0W=2cWENd3P1RPE_+JrONie6JTag@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should pgAdmin 3 be saved?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
Thanks for the answer, Tom. It's nice to get an answer so quickly ;)

Following your advice, I will probably post something about this on
the "pgadmin-hackers" list, a sub-list of the project lists dedicated
to "pgAdmin development and patches." I'm just going to wait a little
bit before, in order to let people react here and to avoid being on
multiple mailing lists at the same time.

I'm crossing my fingers that someone competent perceives the interest
of not letting pgAdmin 3 die completely. It would be great to keep the
good old PgAdmin App Version (aka PgAdmin 3) functional in parallel to
the newer Hosted Web Version of PgAdmin (aka PgAdmin 4).

regards, gm

Le sam. 6 févr. 2021, à 14 h 26, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> a écrit :
>
> Gabriel Martin <grafik.muzik@gmail.com> writes:
> > Do you think there's a possibility that people could fix pgAdmin 3, even if
> > it means making a fork or whatever?
>
> You'd probably be better advised to ask this on the pgadmin project lists.
>
> Certainly, anybody who cares to fork and maintain pgAdmin 3 could do so.
> It's a matter of finding people with the time, interest, and technical
> ability.
>
>                         regards, tom lane



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Peter J. Holzer"
Date:
Subject: Re: vacuumdb not letting me connect to db
Next
From: Joao Miguel Ferreira
Date:
Subject: identifier will be truncated