Re: Why is PostgreSQL 9.1 not using index for simple equality select - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Yang Zhang
Subject Re: Why is PostgreSQL 9.1 not using index for simple equality select
Date
Msg-id CAKxBDU_V6hEABJ-DTntEka900_A3HCEi6=J-MFqddJdegdYxZg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Why is PostgreSQL 9.1 not using index for simple equality select  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
Apologies for that Tom.  I will paste the information in line once I'm
back at my computer.  I do appreciate your help.

On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Yang Zhang <yanghatespam@gmail.com> writes:
>> I updated my SO question with some more info including explain analyze
>> (no difference), \d,
>> and your last incantation.
>
> The question is being asked here, not in SO, and I find it rather
> impolite of you to expect me to go chasing off to some other forum
> to answer your question.
>
>                         regards, tom lane



--
Yang Zhang
http://yz.mit.edu/


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Why is PostgreSQL 9.1 not using index for simple equality select
Next
From: whiplash
Date:
Subject: False unique constraint violation (exception block)