On Fri, Mar 6, 2026 at 2:15 AM Madhav Madhusoodanan
<madhavmadhusoodanan@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Some parts of the merge flow that I am coming up with are as follows
> (assuming tuples from index page B are migrated rightwards into C):
>
> 1. Leaving B's tuples as it is even after merge, to remove the
> possible risk of scans "skipping over" tuples. Essentially, the tuples
> then would be "copied" into C.
> 2. Marking pages B and C with flags similar to INCOMPLETE_SPLIT (say,
> MERGE_SRC and MERGE_DEST respectively) before the actual merge
> process, then marking the pages with another flag upon completion
> (MERGE_COMPLETE) so that other processes can handle transient merge
> states.
> 3. For example, scans that reach page B post-merge (MERGE_SRC +
> MERGE_COMPLETE) would be made to skip to the page to its right.
> 4. Updating VACUUM to handle post-merge cleanup (to remove pages such as B).
>
I was going through the source code to understand whether the
aforementioned direction of changes would be reasonable.
I was observing `BTPageOpaqueData.btpo_flags` [0] which is a uint16,
but only 9 bits are used.
Would using a couple bits of the same for this purpose be reasonable?
Or are they being reserved for future functionality?
Thanks!
Madhav
[0] https://github.com/postgres/postgres/blob/03facc1211b0ff1550f41bcd4da09329080c30f9/src/include/access/nbtree.h#L63
