Re: CoC [Final v2] - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Chris Travers
Subject Re: CoC [Final v2]
Date
Msg-id CAKt_ZfvURURJCgBeUamJBFmt3+cvkWqXuYZdndTiD88dADT6hA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: CoC [Final v2]  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-general
Just to respond to Josh's previous question:

Yes, I ike the current code of conduct.  Much prefer to the alternatives offered aimed at "feeling safe" (for the reason that keeping the peace in a culturally diverse community will not allow people that luxury all the time).

I am not convinced we need one, and I am worried about those who may be moved by recent events to require one.  But I think a statement of some kind by the core committee regarding a productive environment for all is a good thing and this CoC fits that bill

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 8:39 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
Hello,

This thread is deprecated. The CoC Final Draft has been submitted to -core for final modification, acceptance or decline.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

--
Command Prompt, Inc.                  http://the.postgres.company/
                     +1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.


--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general



--
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers

Efficito:  Hosted Accounting and ERP.  Robust and Flexible.  No vendor lock-in.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Johannes
Date:
Subject: Re: long transfer time for binary data
Next
From: Zenaan Harkness
Date:
Subject: request for comment re "contributor-covenant.org"