On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Geoff Winkless <pgsqladmin@geoff.dj> wrote:
On 20 January 2016 at 20:04, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > "which could be considered" is too open-ended. Since this point is > the one and only that can cause enforcement to occur, it should be more > strict as to what it is that will not be tolerated. I'd propose > something like "is widely regarded as harassment" or something like > that, so that it needs to be clear that there is a large group of people > that considers the behavior unwanted rather than some minority.
The problem with _that_ is that on the internet of 3 billion people "a large group of people" can be whipped up from a tiny minority.
At the end of the day this will require human judgment rather than formulation.
Human judgment may be flawed but in a culturally diverse group it is far better than the alternative.
