Re: [BUG] pg_dump does not properly deal with BEGIN ATOMIC function - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Morris de Oryx
Subject Re: [BUG] pg_dump does not properly deal with BEGIN ATOMIC function
Date
Msg-id CAKqncciHBwDYD+xWm9oaJv6D+-GrvFFWzb4YC60HVa4r75vRJA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [BUG] pg_dump does not properly deal with BEGIN ATOMIC function  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Well that was quick. Thank you!

Imseih, Sami what are the chances of getting RDS to apply this patch? Postgres 15 was released nearly 8 months ago, and it would be great to get onto it.

Thanks

On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 3:01 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Morris de Oryx <morrisdeoryx@gmail.com> writes:
> Can anyone suggest a path forward for me with the upgrade to PG 15?

Apply this patch:

https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=ca9e79274938d8ede07d9990c2f6f5107553b524

or more likely, pester RDS to do so sooner than the next quarterly
releases.

                        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Etsuro Fujita
Date:
Subject: Re: postgres_fdw: wrong results with self join + enable_nestloop off
Next
From: Evan Jones
Date:
Subject: [PATCH] pg_regress.c: Fix "make check" on Mac OS X: Pass DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH