Re: Rule Question - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Luca Ferrari
Subject Re: Rule Question
Date
Msg-id CAKoxK+6KaMb+qeENj6eWrF5gGBqQSde8kSR-_6OHDMRrvELsTw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Rule Question  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Luca Ferrari <fluca1978@infinito.it> writes:
>> The original post was related to the update of b, so I guess it is
>> better to limit the trigger scope to update on such column:
>
>> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION b_mirror() RETURNS TRIGGER AS
>>  $mirror$
>>  BEGIN
>>  NEW.a = NEW.b;
>>  RETURN NEW;
>>  END;
>>  $mirror$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
>
>> CREATE TRIGGER tr_b_mirror AFTER UPDATE OF b ON cats FOR EACH ROW
>> EXECUTE PROCEDURE b_mirror();
>
>> It is worth noting that the trigger could be an after one,
>
> No, it has to be a BEFORE trigger, else it's too late to affect the
> row value that gets stored.

Ops..I wrote it without my brain with me: of course it has to be a before one.

Thanks,
Luca


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: V S P
Date:
Subject: Re: Why are stored procedures looked on so negatively?
Next
From: Steve Atkins
Date:
Subject: Re: Why are stored procedures looked on so negatively?