Re: [PATCH] Fix unexpected loss of DEFERRABLE property after toggling NOT ENFORCED / ENFORCED - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Yasuo Honda
Subject Re: [PATCH] Fix unexpected loss of DEFERRABLE property after toggling NOT ENFORCED / ENFORCED
Date
Msg-id CAKmOUTkFx0uvhVWxgG+Ock66zOPs18VbdtfSdbMvpuNv7pchzA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Fix unexpected loss of DEFERRABLE property after toggling NOT ENFORCED / ENFORCED  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> I've pushed the patch. Thanks!

Thanks for reviewing and committing this, and for the fixups.
Once this fix is released, I can complete NOT ENFORCED foreign key
support in Ruby on Rails.

--
Yasuo Honda

On Mon, Mar 30, 2026 at 2:41 PM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2026 at 12:01 AM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Barring any objections, I will commit this and backpatch it to v18, where
> > NOT ENFORCED foreign keys were introduced.
>
> I've pushed the patch. Thanks!
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Fujii Masao



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Álvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: table AM option passing
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug: wrong relname in RemoveSubscriptionRel() error detail