Re: [External] Re: WAL Replication query - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From KK CHN
Subject Re: [External] Re: WAL Replication query
Date
Msg-id CAKgGyB9bcXLHhqP=YYPZqeWKD70AUHdQENPdpszKk0kg_QRR2g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [External] Re: WAL Replication query  (Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>)
List pgsql-admin

Yes, in that case you can lose committed data.  The normal way to avoid that is to use
synchronous replication.  That is easy to set up, but has some implications:

- it will slow down data modifications considerably
- you should have a low network latency between the machines
- the whole system becomes unavailable if the standby goes down, so have at
  least two synchronous standbys if you want good availability


Thanking  all for the prompt replies and guidance for clarifying the doubts and queries. 

Krishane
 

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Laurenz Albe
Date:
Subject: Re: [External] Re: WAL Replication query
Next
From: Wells Oliver
Date:
Subject: Timeline for major versions on Amazon RDS?