Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: doc: Mention clock synchronization recommendation for hot_standby_feedback - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jakub Wartak
Subject Re: doc: Mention clock synchronization recommendation for hot_standby_feedback
Date
Msg-id CAKZiRmzuJv9va__=C6wjVwjFQOjzb+g_E053R8mD5rxtUsU8aA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: doc: Mention clock synchronization recommendation for hot_standby_feedback  (vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: doc: Mention clock synchronization recommendation for hot_standby_feedback
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 11:31 AM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 5 Mar 2025 at 11:46, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 4:44 PM Jakub Wartak
> >
> > I can go with the last patch as you observed that in a real-world
> > case, and we can look at others (if any) on a case-to-case basis.
> > Fujii-San, others, do you have any opinion on this?
>
> +1 for this approach.
>

OK, so I have set this as Ready for Committer (I assume everybody who
wanted to take voice already did).

-J.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tender Wang
Date:
Subject: Re: Add mention in docs about locking all partitions for generic plans
Next
From: Shlok Kyal
Date:
Subject: Re: Restrict publishing of partitioned table with a foreign table as partition